Posts

[search help]
Blacklisted
(help)
Artists
Contributors
Copyrights
Characters
Species
General
Meta

Information

Options

Related

Viewing sample resized to 44% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

Lapis explains penises to Freckles and ends up making a public demonstration. ♥

Lapis, Freckles, Peridot: @LaddingerVAs

Orange Spodumene: @MissMoonified

Music & Sound Design: @SinnthAudio

Cleanup Animators: @BigMelonArt, @Digitalkaijuart, @JacquesTheroNG, @oogabutt

Shocked that this wasnt already here.

Blacklisted
(help)
  • Comments
    •
    Show all comments

    RoxyKrystalLoonatic

    Member

    Melieconiek animations are so amazingly animated and incredibly hot and well voiced; this was no exception!!! Sadly knowing how the subject matter is seen on this site, it will probably be removed*. Well at least I can enjoy it while it lasts!!!

    cosmosarts said:
    where are the furries or anthros?

    *While that is not a valid reason this will be taken down, the mods usually consider those characters too human to be on here.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 4
    •

    ihavenoidea645

    Member

    poonerfag said:
    Why is this tagged andromorph??

    Because language is stupid and too many people who use the tag fail to look at a vast majority of it's use before applying it.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
    •

    thatguywhoisfurry

    Member

    what I don't get is that creatures like gems given a humanoid form is seen as "not okay on this site" or "not furry enough" but like, elf's are? Hilyans are? where the only difference is the pointy ears? Like I've seen someones Palworld art of one of the more 'human' looking characters was removed because the artist forgot the horn, still had pointy ears, but they were purple so it was """too human like""".
    This site is weird sometimes...

  • Reply
  • |
  • 15
    •

    CosmosArts

    Member

    thatguywhoisfurry said:
    what I don't get is that creatures like gems given a humanoid form is seen as "not okay on this site" or "not furry enough" but like, elf's are? Hilyans are? where the only difference is the pointy ears? Like I've seen someones Palworld art of one of the more 'human' looking characters was removed because the artist forgot the horn, still had pointy ears, but they were purple so it was """too human like""".
    This site is weird sometimes...

    basically artist nepotism, plus its literally there in the guidelines but yeah keep giving me downvotes people

  • Reply
  • |
  • -6
    •

    thatguywhoisfurry

    Member

    cosmosarts said:
    basically artist nepotism, plus its literally there in the guidelines but yeah keep giving me downvotes people

    my point is why ISN'T stuff like gems or human like but their purple/green and obviously not humans okay, but shit like elves are perfectly fine, dispute 999/1000 of them being depicted as literally human, but with pointed ears and/or a slightly different eyes. Seems like one of those things where whomever is doing the judging has a bias.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 9
    •

    IncogRoses

    Member

    Idk I think this site has just been on a huge downward decline for the past 1-2 years. Something's just felt off and shifty behind the scenes.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
    •

    CosmosArts

    Member

    thatguywhoisfurry said:
    my point is why ISN'T stuff like gems or human like but their purple/green and obviously not humans okay, but shit like elves are perfectly fine, dispute 999/1000 of them being depicted as literally human, but with pointed ears and/or a slightly different eyes. Seems like one of those things where whomever is doing the judging has a bias.

    yeah i think the same why are ogres elfs and other humanoids from fantasy (even goblins) allowed but not other things

  • Reply
  • |
  • -5
    •

    Haoss

    Member

    thatguywhoisfurry said:
    what I don't get is that creatures like gems given a humanoid form is seen as "not okay on this site" or "not furry enough" but like, elf's are? Hilyans are? where the only difference is the pointy ears? Like I've seen someones Palworld art of one of the more 'human' looking characters was removed because the artist forgot the horn, still had pointy ears, but they were purple so it was """too human like""".
    This site is weird sometimes...

    At the very least it's clearly written that way now. Used to be really vague and subjective which posts got removed and which didn't. Now you can at least predict what is OK and what isn't.
    I still thinks elves are a massive inconsistency with the rules though, even as someone who don't mind some human content here and there.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    abadbird

    Janitor

    Since everyone will be confused, approved for the short licking sequence 1:44-1:48 because the gem thing is sticking out of the character's back, like any gardevoir chest/back spike we're usually approving for. A main character is shown to have relevant anatomy. Usually, I will ignore anatomical gems, like forehead_gem, because they are flat to the body and just hard to really distinguish from a spot, which is not relevant. I will approve for anatomy that has what I call dimensionality, where something nonhuman is protruding from the standard human form or where that form is hollowed out (post #5478522 - chica's neck, wrist, and knee joints).

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    Mxmeow

    Member

    abadbird said:
    Since everyone will be confused, approved for the short licking sequence 1:44-1:48 because the gem thing is sticking out of the character's back, like any gardevoir chest/back spike we're usually approving for. A main character is shown to have relevant anatomy. Usually, I will ignore anatomical gems, like forehead_gem, because they are flat to the body and just hard to really distinguish from a spot, which is not relevant. I will approve for anatomy that has what I call dimensionality, where something nonhuman is protruding from the standard human form or where that form is hollowed out (post #5478522 - chica's neck, wrist, and knee joints).

    Bro is the goon lawyer, pulling out his goon cases to make an argument for goon law and regulations.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
    •

    jklcolenslash

    Member

    incogroses said:
    Idk I think this site has just been on a huge downward decline for the past 1-2 years. Something's just felt off and shifty behind the scenes.

    agreed. It's like everyone's always looking for an excuse or reasons to remove works from the site instead of arguing to keep it on.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 7
    •

    Poonerfag

    Member

    thatguywhoisfurry said:
    what I don't get is that creatures like gems given a humanoid form is seen as "not okay on this site" or "not furry enough" but like, elf's are? Hilyans are? where the only difference is the pointy ears? Like I've seen someones Palworld art of one of the more 'human' looking characters was removed because the artist forgot the horn, still had pointy ears, but they were purple so it was """too human like""".
    This site is weird sometimes...

    Dude it's bad enough that I JUST realized this is a furry site from reading this comment I might be dumb tho

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    ItisI

    Member

    mxmeow said:
    Bro is the goon lawyer, pulling out his goon cases to make an argument for goon law and regulations.

    Look man, this site has been up for years. You don't keep a functional community Website going unless there's proper rules and regulations. I know this is kind of a weird thing to be serious about but... you're gonna have to. Otherwise shit starts going bad, fast. And with that, the quality and support drops. Thats how shady, virus-ridden, unmaintained websites happen.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •

    Miszuq

    Member

    1:35 NO NO NO NO NO NO GET OUT OF MY HEAD GET OUT OF MY HEAD AHHHHHHH

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
    •

    IncogRoses

    Member

    mxmeow said:
    Bro is the goon lawyer, pulling out his goon cases to make an argument for goon law and regulations.

    I lol'd

  • Reply
  • |
  • 0
    •