Well, do you still have your previous version?

niffirgkcaj said:
Well, do you still have your previous version?

yeah it's on my other socials, It just got taken down here on e6
waited too long to get an answer, so I just got impatient and "fixed" it

A shame you had to prove it was furry. The animation is nonetheless splendid.

scythe_tooth said:
A shame you had to prove it was furry. The animation is nonetheless splendid.

thank youuu <333

Glad you got this gem back up! It's amazing!

k0moya said:
yeah it's on my other socials, It just got taken down here on e6
waited too long to get an answer, so I just got impatient and "fixed" it

i mean i get that they dont want human stuff in here, yet alot human stuff are posted here and stay, e621 just sucks when its about helping artists out, some rules are just, lets say the worst, only the best rule is r34, they dont have such Limits.
yeah i dont like when i see furryporn that a human is involved, but its unfair when some artists are forced to remove them while many others are allowed to keep them

hornyumbreo said:
i mean i get that they dont want human stuff in here, yet alot human stuff are posted here and stay, e621 just sucks when its about helping artists out, some rules are just, lets say the worst, only the best rule is r34, they dont have such Limits.
yeah i dont like when i see furryporn that a human is involved, but its unfair when some artists are forced to remove them while many others are allowed to keep them

Yeah, I got rly mad at first cuz it didn't made any sense, it was just my fursona after all
Heard a few mods talking about my anim looking more like bodypaint than fur.
It's a bit of a stretch considering other things they allow here but, I guess it is what it is and we can't do shiz about it :/

k0moya said:
Yeah, I got rly mad at first cuz it didn't made any sense, it was just my fursona after all
Heard a few mods talking about my anim looking more like bodypaint than fur.
It's a bit of a stretch considering other things they allow here but, I guess it is what it is and we can't do shiz about it :/

well if they remove your stuff for dumb reasons, the best way is to go to r34, its also the same situation with fnaf security breach, you have gregory in your Animations or drawings, most posts get to stay, but some get removed cause gregory is near real young humanlike, i mean then how come that is fair towards many others?
Either their bot is broken or dumb, or their staff members just do some wheel spins if it stays or not, if they make a strict rule, then they should apply it to everyone, not to just some. e621 should be a furry pornsite. still you see human ones in it or the anime characters.
its just sad how some artists get treated

k0moya said:
Yeah, I got rly mad at first cuz it didn't made any sense, it was just my fursona after all
Heard a few mods talking about my anim looking more like bodypaint than fur.
It's a bit of a stretch considering other things they allow here but, I guess it is what it is and we can't do shiz about it :/

Trying to say something looks more like body paint than fur is a massive stretch, they must just like to remove posts or something because I dunno why you would want to intentionally try and convince yourself that a certain piece is "Not Furry Enough" or some shit lol

Anyway, it's a great animation so keep up the good work.

Shame for the other version, but hey, at least it's back up in another way now.

"sry, ur fursona is too human, b

E621's management at its finest

k0moya said:
Yeah, I got rly mad at first cuz it didn't made any sense, it was just my fursona after all
Heard a few mods talking about my anim looking more like bodypaint than fur.
It's a bit of a stretch considering other things they allow here but, I guess it is what it is and we can't do shiz about it :/

y'know what, i can't find anything nice to say about that verdict, so i hope e6 staff has a great day

its really really hot! I love the foreskin heheh

ixtab said:
Trying to say something looks more like body paint than fur is a massive stretch, they must just like to remove posts or something because I dunno why you would want to intentionally try and convince yourself that a certain piece is "Not Furry Enough" or some shit lol

Anyway, it's a great animation so keep up the good work.

Which is BIZARRE because there's an actual not_furry tag with over 167,000 entries.

Checked out the removed version on the artist's socials...

...That? That was the version that was tagged as non-furry?? The animation with a secondary fur color going down the stomach and crotch, a ringed marking on the wrist, a spot on the hand, and a distinct lack of human nails??? Are we really trying to have worse moderation than Twitter or Youtube that makes you question whether or not some decisions are made by actual humans????

Same thing happened to me, granted I can actually see why mine got flagged. But it does seem like the mods have been on an anti human crusade lately.
Anyway, great animation!

Is that a Wacom Intuos I see on the desk?

Really good animation btw!

codeofzoot said:
Checked out the removed version on the artist's socials...

...That? That was the version that was tagged as non-furry?? The animation with a secondary fur color going down the stomach and crotch, a ringed marking on the wrist, a spot on the hand, and a distinct lack of human nails??? Are we really trying to have worse moderation than Twitter or Youtube that makes you question whether or not some decisions are made by actual humans????

starting a gofundme to get e6 mods a pair of glasses

just a normal pov for an e621 user

Amazing foreskin and head action, great job

Foreskin~~~ :333

best solo masturbation animation on this site by far

Moist

Honestly, removing a post because its "to human" when there are thousands of other non-furry posts is just fucking stupid. For the longest time I was under the impression that this was a site for just whatever art you make, no limits, but clearly it's not! Now, this part might just be my opinion, but choosing to remove "human" posts out of anything else is just fucking stupid. If you're going to add something that people aren't allowed to post on your mainly porn art site, why would you choose humans in general over things like, oh idk, cub art???

I swear, every furry site is either overly censored to the point of people not being allowed to post first-stage Pokemon, or censored in the most stupid ways possible.

the fluids and movement is immaculate, every drop every bounce is chef's kiss

I think this website is turn me gay. At first I was like AH penis now I'm like that's a good looking cock

kaycoyote said:
starting a gofundme to get e6 mods a pair of glasses

Wouldn't be surprised if you got a strike for saying that xD Mods here are always on a power trip.

mairo said:
Tag what you see has been part of the website since the beginnings and uploading guidelines have been revised to outline what is and isn't acceptable.
This is website is image board or booru for digital furry artwork. This is not personal gallery, this is not social media, this is not rule34 site, this is not pornsite.
It's not censoring, this curation has also been part of the site since forever and I alone have been here over a decade already, enforcing and curating content on basically daily basis. It's about focus and if you logically think about it, humans are basically the opposite of anthro, they are not furry, why would we want not furry content, on furry website? Cubs by definition, are furry on other hand for example.

The site is artwork focused, not artist focused, so just because furry artists draws stuff, does not mean that we will host their stuff without questions asked. This is also why even if artist states that the character in post is a dragon, but visually they look like human, they are treated like human.
I do remember the time when artists were given privileged rank without questions asked so their stuff was autoapproved, which lead into a lot of posts back then just slipping by where artists did drew pure humans or were posting othervice unacceptable content like really bad photographs.

I'm just mostly amazed how much people are unaware of how the site operates and works, even though majority of it is transparent.
Just as an example, yesterday alone, janitors manually deleted 181 uploaded posts while 2195 posts were uploaded here. These kinds of human only deletions happens many times daily.

Under current human guidelines and visible information, the previous post #5502780 is irrelevant for us, but this post does have clear visual detail to indicate the character is anthro instead of human/humanoid and it's fine to stay.

dude, this artist has their literal furry character, if you just did some research or looked at what their furry character is, you wouldve seen that its literally a damn furry and not a human, i mean we all see that. the tags also said furry so where is the excuse?

ixtab said:
Trying to say something looks more like body paint than fur is a massive stretch, they must just like to remove posts or something because I dunno why you would want to intentionally try and convince yourself that a certain piece is "Not Furry Enough" or some shit lol

Anyway, it's a great animation so keep up the good work.

removing it for that then theres zelda stuff where the only non-human stuff is pointy elf ears:

hornyumbreo said:
dude, this artist has their literal furry character, if you just did some research or looked at what their furry character is, you wouldve seen that its literally a damn furry and not a human, i mean we all see that. the tags also said furry so where is the excuse?

Anyone could put whatever they want in the tags, and a normally furry character can easily be drawn as a human instead, so neither of those mean anything. We have to be able to see something that looks like a furry in the art itself, otherwise delete

spe said:
Anyone could put whatever they want in the tags, and a normally furry character can easily be drawn as a human instead, so neither of those mean anything. We have to be able to see something that looks like a furry in the art itself, otherwise delete

or just take a better look and not just think of deleting it? then you all must delete so many other posts that have only elfs, or other human like posts, since those arent furrys, im just saying that if you punish one post about that "situation" what about all the others that get the OK to stay??? and dont say this one is about bodypaint

what if someones furry main character has very short fur and no tail? and only genitals or the body is to be seen, but very different furcolors?? does now every body that has no tail etc. now count to human?

hornyumbreo said:
dude, this artist has their literal furry character, if you just did some research or looked at what their furry character is, you wouldve seen that its literally a damn furry and not a human, i mean we all see that. the tags also said furry so where is the excuse?

This is literally what I'm talking about.
People assume how things work, when things do not actually work like that.
Tag what you see, not what you know.

Also I know that people are here defending the artist so discussing about these directly or transparently is never productive, hence why I have stopped normally commenting like this and responding to dmails, because it's all just angry and doesn't really change anything.

k0moya said:
Yeah, I got rly mad at first cuz it didn't made any sense, it was just my fursona after all
Heard a few mods talking about my anim looking more like bodypaint than fur.
It's a bit of a stretch considering other things they allow here but, I guess it is what it is and we can't do shiz about it :/

That’s crazy “ looks like bodypaint rather than fur” can be said for most of the art on this site XD it’s always just flat with some random fluff here and there. Also there is LOADS of human stuff on this site I can’t believe it’s not allowed. I see human stuff each and every time I come to this site

mairo said:
This is literally what I'm talking about.
People assume how things work, when things do not actually work like that.
Tag what you see, not what you know.

Also I know that people are here defending the artist so discussing about these directly or transparently is never productive, hence why I have stopped normally commenting like this and responding to dmails, because it's all just angry and doesn't really change anything.

maybe you and others need to change some things to make things work how everyone is happy about, not punish one person for well doing nothing wrong, but keeping those we dont follow the actual rules of posting, the ither end needs to be fixed, not our end, and thats a nice feedback towards you and the others, e621 is a furryporn site, for furry porn., its well explained here, so if then focus please on those who like post elfs only stuff or human only, that are actual humans, not like some furry art that gets always mistaken in the wrong way and then people either getting upset or mad for the unfairness, i respect your work for this site, but just accept that mistakes happened and that you go: " ok i did something wrong, sry" is better than trying to defend the wrong end.
so to make it clear, different color of body where you have short fur or it also being a scalie from the crotch shot, doesnt mean its a human with bodypaint okay? thx

spe said: We have to be able to see something that looks like a furry in the art itself, otherwise delete

What human has ghost white and pastel yellow skin with brown markings? In a very animal standard pattern too? Just curious.

hornyumbreo said:
maybe you and others need to change some things to make things work how everyone is happy about, not punish one person for well doing nothing wrong, but keeping those we dont follow the actual rules of posting, the ither end needs to be fixed, not our end, and thats a nice feedback towards you and the others, e621 is a furryporn site, for furry porn., its well explained here, so if then focus please on those who like post elfs only stuff or human only, that are actual humans, not like some furry art that gets always mistaken in the wrong way and then people either getting upset or mad for the unfairness, i respect your work for this site, but just accept that mistakes happened and that you go: " ok i did something wrong, sry" is better than trying to defend the wrong end.
so to make it clear, different color of body where you have short fur or it also being a scalie from the crotch shot, doesnt mean its a human with bodypaint okay? thx

e621 is not furryporn site for furry porn, it's furry artwork website to feature digital anthromorphic artwork. This is why the curation is also based around artistical merits, not that it's porn.

Also things are updated and the last update to human stuff was that skin color no longer counts, also dubbed as "gem ban" by many during that time, hence why we are in this situation where even if character has unusual skin color for a human, it's still considered as human nowdays.
Elves are also deleted whenever their non-human traits are not visual on the post itself, I get so many dmails about deleting link or zelda for example when their ears are not visible on the uploaded post.

Again, this is one of those thing that has already been discussed in many occasions, but most of the time it's people being mad that something they made got deleted and the situation should be changed so that that one specific thing is acceptable, but then failing to see the bigger picture as to how to actually accomplish that in manner that's enforceable on larger scale and going by our visual data policy rather than lore.
As such this discussion is yet again, waste of time and unfruitful, continue in forums where you can also find many threads of previous discussions.

mairo said:
e621 is not furryporn site for furry porn, it's furry artwork website to feature digital anthromorphic artwork. This is why the curation is also based around artistical merits, not that it's porn.

Also things are updated and the last update to human stuff was that skin color no longer counts, also dubbed as "gem ban" by many during that time, hence why we are in this situation where even if character has unusual skin color for a human, it's still considered as human nowdays.
Elves are also deleted whenever their non-human traits are not visual on the post itself, I get so many dmails about deleting link or zelda for example when their ears are not visible on the uploaded post.

Again, this is one of those thing that has already been discussed in many occasions, but most of the time it's people being mad that something they made got deleted and the situation should be changed so that that one specific thing is acceptable, but then failing to see the bigger picture as to how to actually accomplish that in manner that's enforceable on larger scale and going by our visual data policy rather than lore.
As such this discussion is yet again, waste of time and unfruitful, continue in forums where you can also find many threads of previous discussions.

e621 is known for literal furry porn, so is r34 except they accept more other stuff than just furry, e621 is furryporn, done
furaffinity is for sfw drawings about furry etc. and dude, we all use e621 to watch furry porn, to nut to furry porn, so stop telling me or others its not a furry porn site.
stop trying to defend something that isnt there, saying "oh that one looks like a skincolor, hmm what should we do? oh yeah we wont look into the account or talk to the artist who made that animation aka drawing if its a furry character or literally seeing that the artist draws furry porn only"

with other words, let people have fun and enjoy the damn website for what its actually made for and used, no need to add extra rules etc. i mean we literally have a blacklist??

I mean, you can get pedantic and say that e621 isn't a porn site in the same way that onlyfans isn't a porn site, and you'd be technically right.
However, something's intended purpose and the way people actually end up using it for can be two very different things.