Awesome! Who is the artist?

Calibrator said:
Awesome! Who is the artist?

deviantpig on FA, but I don't know how to tag artists.

Calibrator said:
Awesome! Who is the artist?

also, there are two others to this set

I've updated some of the tags as best as I'm able.

Vivaperoggi548 said:
deviantpig on FA, but I don't know how to tag artists.

I just did it for you.

It's actually just to add the tag if the artist tag already exists, and if the artist tag doesn't exist, just put "artist:" before the tag and it'll make it an artist tag.

CantThinkOfAUsername said:
I just did it for you.

It's actually just to add the tag if the artist tag already exists, and if the artist tag doesn't exist, just put "artist:" before the tag and it'll make it an artist tag.

Thanks!!

Vivaperoggi548 said:
Thanks!!

No problem!

I fucking love this. This site needs more ferals like this

That was so Awesome! I would love to be in that guy's position!

Now that's a way to avoid pregnancy!

FoxyLuv said:
My dog does this to me everyday and I let him!

Uhhhhhhh

FoxyLuv said:
My dog does this to me everyday and I let him!

Does your dog change to human after each time?

So wait he transforms human women into dog bitches?

FoxyLuv said:
My dog does this to me everyday and I let him!

*in a sarcastically enthusiastic voice*

maybe you shouldn't tell people that!

Why aren't we funding this?

Pas mal.
+1

One day I'll know how that dude felt...........one day........

Fenrick said:
Probably because smart people have other things in mind than advances in dog raping technology

Nah, some smart people would rather make things equal and be against discrimination against zoophiles.
But hey, why'd you bring up rape?
That's a bit weird to bring it up out of nowhere.

Fenrick said:
I strongly question that claim

I can easily say the same for yours.

NoxCL said:
As much as i love this comic, you need to be a fuckhead to defend real life beastiality.

You spelling bestiality wrong already tells me enough.
And of course I do, I support things I like, especially when it can be done in a harmless way.

He didn't rape a dog. He was having sex with his human girlfriend and she transformed into the dog. He was inside her when she changed so I don't see how that would suddenly become rape. Because at what point of her transformation from human to dog did their initial consensual sex become rape?

Vivaperoggi548 said:
He didn't rape a dog. He was having sex with his human girlfriend and she transformed into the dog. He was inside her when she changed so I don't see how that would suddenly become rape. Because at what point of her transformation from human to dog did their initial consensual sex become rape?

See, here's the thing. "Bestiality / Zoophilia is rape" is, I think, a post-hoc justification for why someone feels uncomfortable with the subject. And I think the fact that people are spouting that line on this comic, where the partner in this case is a human turned into a dog (and so presumably may still have a human mind), shows clearly that this isn't a rational argument, but rather just a thin veneer they can wrap around their personal feelings of disgust to make them seem more presentable. A veneer they are clinging to with such strength that they don't even realize when it doesn't apply by their own rules.

To put it more simply, the people using that line are totally undermining their own argument - showing it for what it really is: a baseless justification for personal feelings.

Clawdragons said:
See, here's the thing. "Bestiality / Zoophilia is rape" is, I think, a post-hoc justification for why someone feels uncomfortable with the subject. And I think the fact that people are spouting that line on this comic, where the partner in this case is a human turned into a dog (and so presumably may still have a human mind), shows clearly that this isn't a rational argument, but rather just a thin veneer they can wrap around their personal feelings of disgust to make them seem more presentable. A veneer they are clinging to with such strength that they don't even realize when it doesn't apply by their own rules.

To put it more simply, the people using that line are totally undermining their own argument - showing it for what it really is: a baseless justification for personal feelings.

It's sort of a silly argument for most people to be supporting in the first place: posturing for the agency of animals when they most likely benefit from and condone, to some extent, the cultivation of livestock, lab/medicinal testing, domestication, and so on. But suddenly, when things take a sexual turn, a line's been crossed, even in such a fetishistic community. It's kind of funny.

NoxCL said:
All the downvoted anti-bestiality comments just show what kind of people browse this site. Kill yourself if you have sex with animals, seriously. It's not the animals fault you've been rejected by every single woman in your life. Don't torture them for your own lust.

Except some people prefer animals over humans, like me.
I haven't been rejected because I don't like humans in the first place.
I love how your attitude is so common towards zoophiles and it's not even right.
Alrighty kiddo, sorry that you are like a sheep and really can't think rationally.

WarCanine said:

You may get upset, and you're free to default to sad ad hominem attacks. However, at the end of the day...

the law is absolute.

EightyNine said:
You may get upset, and you're free to default to sad ad hominem attacks. However, at the end of the day...

the law is absolute.

I'm not upset or sad. I'm just saying what I think.
Anyways, laws don't decide what is right and what is not.
Follow reality, not the imaginations of others.
Also, a law won't stop me from what I've been doing.

WarCanine said:
I'm not upset or sad. I'm just saying what I think.
Anyways, laws don't decide what is right and what is not.
Follow reality, not the imaginations of others.
Also, a law won't stop me from what I've been doing.

Yeah, you misunderstood the meaning of "sad" in that context. I recommend re-reading it.
Regardless, the law is effectively consuetudo pro lege servatur. And, surprise, most people are going to tell you you're not allowed to fuck your dog. Most people don't want to hear about it, either.

EightyNine said:
Yeah, you misunderstood the meaning of "sad" in that context. I recommend re-reading it.
Regardless, the law is effectively consuetudo pro lege servatur. And, surprise, most people are going to tell you you're not allowed to fuck your dog. Most people don't want to hear about it, either.

I know what you meant by sad, even if I didn't my point still stands.
I really don't care what the laws are.
I'm not going to listen to rules if they don't make sense and I won't listen to people's subjective opinions.
And surprise, I don't need to hear about other people fucking eachother either and yet I still hear it.
I do the same thing then, although it's a lie because I've never 'fucked' a dog.
But still, I'll defend zoophilia and bestiality when it needs to be done.

EightyNine said:
You may get upset, and you're free to default to sad ad hominem attacks. However, at the end of the day...

the law is absolute.

I mean, there's something to be said about how we can kill, cook, and eat animals without blinking an eye. I'd rather be screwed than stewed.

TheTundraTerror said:
I mean, there's something to be said about how we can kill, cook, and eat animals without blinking an eye. I'd rather be screwed than stewed.

Double standards are cool like that. Rearing in captivity for slaughter is fine, but damn you for even considering to indulge an act that's biologically designed to induce pleasure! That's unusually cruel, and it's going too far!

Fenrick said:
One of them is (intended to be) done out of necessity. For the sake of survival. Another is done for pleasure. You can tell me all you want about how it's pleasurable but I assure you: you won't change anyone's mind here. My point is that you can't equate the two anymore than you can say "We kill animals, so what's the problem with poking their eyes out while they're alive?"

Were animal husbandry an actual necessity to survive, I'd agree with you. In terms of resources required to meet nutritional needs, it's usually nowhere near the most efficient method.

And there's no need to bring up intent at all if you're going to say it matters for one act, and not for another. If the person that just wants to screw wouldn't win the emotional appeal, I don't know why you think captivity and wholesale slaughter would.

Sure, animals are already widely regarded as expendable for collective human benefit with exception to unnecessary cruelty. Definitions of "cruelty" vary. Might be why animal rights was/is something of an issue.

However, there IS a good reason to advocate against bestiality that's not an arbitrary moral decision: cross-species disease transmission. Of course, information and preventative measures relevant to bestiality might be more common were it not taboo, but oh well. Can't change what's already done.

So sexy :3

WarCanine said:
Nah, some smart people would rather make things equal and be against discrimination against zoophiles.
But hey, why'd you bring up rape?
That's a bit weird to bring it up out of nowhere.

You molest dogs and then turn around and act like the victim lmfao

You can jerk off to whatever drawn shit you want to. Raping an animal is sick. End of discussion

Dutchnoob said:
You can jerk off to whatever drawn shit you want to. Raping an animal is sick. End of discussion

Dude seeing people disliking my comment for being against rape of all things is both depressing and hilarious.

Dutchnoob said:
Dude seeing people disliking my comment for being against rape of all things is both depressing and hilarious.

Where's the rape, though?

God I wish I could know how this feels without doing things that are morally questionable at best.

Like, I'm not a fan of the transformation stuff but god damn this last page is hot.

Also this comment section is quite a ride, lul.

DVNC said:
Where's the rape, though?

Is having sex with a 3 year old human rape?

Dutchnoob said:
Is having sex with a 3 year old human rape?

I assume you're bait leads me to saying 'Yes', and you reply with a 3 year old dog getting raped.
3 year old humans aren't sexually mature. A 3 year old canine is. The only thing that debates rape is the object of consent, which is a bag of worms because of the whole intelligence thing.
I believe my initial comment was asking where is the rape? The conversation started with some weirdo talking about what his dog does to him, and then concept of rape was brought out of nowhere for this thread. Why do you keep talking about raping animals? How about not fucking animals, full stop?
I'll say this so you don't have to: HEY, DUMBASSES, DON'T FUCK YOUR ANIMALS.

DVNC said:
I assume you're bait leads me to saying 'Yes', and you reply with a 3 year old dog getting raped.
3 year old humans aren't sexually mature. A 3 year old canine is. The only thing that debates rape is the object of consent, which is a bag of worms because of the whole intelligence thing.
I believe my initial comment was asking where is the rape? The conversation started with some weirdo talking about what his dog does to him, and then concept of rape was brought out of nowhere for this thread. Why do you keep talking about raping animals? How about not fucking animals, full stop?
I'll say this so you don't have to: HEY, DUMBASSES, DON'T FUCK YOUR ANIMALS.

Dogs are sexually mature for other dogs. Dogs get vaginal infections, tearing, and even die because some piece of shit decided to fuck them

what the actual fuck happened in the comment section here holy shit

technocolor said:
what the actual fuck happened in the comment section here holy shit

Agreed holy crap

.