furaffinity.net/view/60378841/
↑589♥980C4
Blacklisted
News: Feb 26, 2025 Show
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
.
close
Posts
[search help]Blacklisted
Artists
Copyrights
Characters
Species
- ? + – canid 1388k
- ? + – canine 1343k
- ? + – canis 738k
- ? + – mammal 3581k
- ? + – wolf 343k
General
- ? + – animal genitalia 511k
- ? + – animal penis 355k
- ? + – anthro 3536k
- ? + – bodily fluids 1527k
- ? + – bottomwear 437k
- ? + – canine genitalia 182k
- ? + – canine penis 161k
- ? + – chair 48k
- ? + – clothing 2194k
- ? + – crop top 31k
- ? + – cum 728k
- ? + – dim lighting 702
- ? + – duo 1688k
- ? + – ejaculation 233k
- ? + – erection 933k
- ? + – feet 657k
- ? + – female 2683k
- ? + – foot fetish 57k
- ? + – foot on face 4.0k
- ? + – foot play 34k
- ? + – foot sniffing 1.3k
- ? + – footjob 18k
- ? + – fully erect inside sheath 134
- ? + – furniture 339k
- ? + – genital fluids 1088k
- ? + – genitals 2389k
- ? + – interrogation room 105
- ? + – jewelry 259k
- ? + – knot in sheath 2.0k
- ? + – leggings 17k
- ? + – legwear 323k
- ? + – locker room 10k
- ? + – male 2655k
- ? + – male/female 707k
- ? + – necklace 130k
- ? + – penis 1644k
- ? + – premature ejaculation 1.3k
- ? + – sex 1079k
- ? + – sheath 96k
- ? + – sheath pressing 53
- ? + – sheathjob 92
- ? + – shirt 348k
- ? + – shorts 116k
- ? + – sniffing 15k
- ? + – topwear 581k
Mairo
JanitorYou know you can just make APNG and Furaffinity also supports those? Also e621 and it would be even higher quality than video which is so low bitrate I can see blocking artifacts in every gradient and dark area.
wiley katmerre
MemberIt's fine. The video has less visible banding. If anything, it's like a coarse dither. Better yet, why not use dithering techniques on highly compressed web formats? It's a good compromise. Either way, good advice.
Login to respond »