Damn Mac, she not tight enough?

Someone is having performance issues.

Big Mac is deadpanning on the bottom right panel.

Thats weird, she seems tight enough (aka the "bulge") to make him have many orgasms.

Random fact: It's possible for men to ejaculate without an orgasm. When this happens it's possible to last for a ridiculous amount of time beyond the hours even this comic has listed. This can lead to a few issues including what feels like the most painful cramp in your balls if breaks aren't taken. However if breaks are taken and one stays hydrated it can become amazing for all those involved. ....I'm gonna go hide back in my corner now.

so, fun math-fact, at the 2 hour mark, rarity would of hit an estimated 149 orgasms (rounded up).

NyahMyah said:
Random fact: It's possible for men to ejaculate without an orgasm. When this happens it's possible to last for a ridiculous amount of time beyond the hours even this comic has listed. This can lead to a few issues including what feels like the most painful cramp in your balls if breaks aren't taken. However if breaks are taken and one stays hydrated it can become amazing for all those involved. ....I'm gonna go hide back in my corner now.

how the fuck is that even possible

nyahmyah said:
Random fact: It's possible for men to ejaculate without an orgasm. When this happens it's possible to last for a ridiculous amount of time beyond the hours even this comic has listed. This can lead to a few issues including what feels like the most painful cramp in your balls if breaks aren't taken. However if breaks are taken and one stays hydrated it can become amazing for all those involved. ....I'm gonna go hide back in my corner now.

So the legends? They are true!?

mad_dok said:
so, fun math-fact, at the 2 hour mark, rarity would of hit an estimated 149 orgasms (rounded up).

Based on which panel? The orgasm/time ratios are each rather different

duncanprice said:
Based on which panel? The orgasm/time ratios are each rather different

It's been a while, but if memory serves me, I took the average of all three (74.6/hr) and timed by 2. This is a linear estimate though. A prediction.

So for shits and giggles, I also re-did the calculations in a quadratic formula (0=-.2411x2 + .411x + 1.0631) and got like 38.2 something after 2 hours, which feels off. Please don't hate me if this is absolutely wrong, been years since I've done that kind of math. _{was kind of fun to do again though}

404: Nut not found.