x.com/olchasart/status/1900958067820241087
pixiv.net/artworks/128258199
Blacklisted
News: Feb 26, 2025 Show
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
.
close
Posts
[search help]Blacklisted
Artists
Copyrights
Characters
Species
- ? + – felid 736k
- ? + – feline 474k
- ? + – mammal 3589k
- ? + – thiren 925
General
- ? + – anthro 3546k
- ? + – back dimples 494
- ? + – back groove 2.1k
- ? + – bedding 38k
- ? + – big butt 397k
- ? + – blush 1054k
- ? + – breasts 1842k
- ? + – butt 1087k
- ? + – choker 46k
- ? + – convenient censorship 11k
- ? + – eyebrows 268k
- ? + – female 2688k
- ? + – female anthro 65k
- ? + – flower 67k
- ? + – fur 1837k
- ? + – green eyes 342k
- ? + – hot stone massage 16
- ? + – hot stones 15
- ? + – jewelry 259k
- ? + – legs together 9.8k
- ? + – looking at viewer 973k
- ? + – looking back 309k
- ? + – looking back at viewer 52k
- ? + – lying 422k
- ? + – massage 1.8k
- ? + – multicolored body 350k
- ? + – multicolored fur 243k
- ? + – necklace 130k
- ? + – nude 1319k
- ? + – on front 65k
- ? + – orange body 211k
- ? + – orange fur 158k
- ? + – pillow 87k
- ? + – plant 344k
- ? + – rear view 183k
- ? + – scene interpretation 197
- ? + – side boob 47k
- ? + – solo 2467k
- ? + – tail 1493k
- ? + – tail aside 4.5k
- ? + – tan body 209k
- ? + – tan fur 147k
- ? + – thick thighs 520k
- ? + – two tone body 199k
- ? + – two tone fur 134k
- ? + – wide hips 335k
Meta
Information
- ID: 5435304
- Source:
- Rating: Questionable
- Score: 845
- Posted:
- Size: 800x1200 (507 KB)
- Type: JPG
- Status: Active
- Favorites: 1560 Show
NordicWerewolf
MemberDamn that's so good.
Edit: wait how doesn't the pics made by olchas get more upvotes, the quality is amaizing.
Updated
Blustygub
MemberMaybe because their style is too "photorealistic", which may be not very appealing to some people.
Anyway, if this pic doesn't get at least 500 upvotes, it'll be outrageous.
NordicWerewolf
MemberThat could be the case indeed and yeah I'd expect this one to blow up at least. Everything about this screams perfection.
ArcticTheDumbSylveon
Memberthis is really well done i love it
ReadyOrKnot
MemberIs that why i always see amazing artists not being upvoted? Because it’s too high quality for some people?
electrobeat23
MemberI'd hazard to say it's because pretty much all of their art is rated questionable/safe and barely qualifies as "furry" (save for this one)
DragonRanger
Former StaffThe artist admits he’s not into furry, so Pulchra is the exception.
In DeNile
MemberIf they draw stuff that fits, they don't need to be.
Lol30
MemberWhat I wouldn't give to reach through the screen and grab that ass.
HarleyCS
MemberIt's bootyful 😻.
Login to respond »