furaffinity.net/view/11240606/
Blacklisted
News: Feb 26, 2025 Show
Feb 26th:A new bill in Arizona is making its way through the Senate that would force sites like e621 to implement mandatory age verification for all users—or face potential lawsuits. This system would require third-party vendors to verify every user’s age through a government database. Not only is this a massive violation of privacy, but it also introduces serious risks, including identity theft through phishing schemes and other malicious methods. Worse still, we would have no control over ensuring that user data is permanently deleted after verification.
Since e621 operates out of Arizona, this law would almost certainly impact us if it passes. If you want to help ensure that we can continue serving you without being forced to collect personal information, we urge you to contact Arizona’s senators and ask them to vote NO on this bill.
Please help spread the word about this issue and encourage others to take action.
Further information on the bill itself can be found at the Free Speech Coalition: https://action.freespeechcoalition.com/bill/arizona-hb-2112/
Jan 7th: Small update to the Uploading Guidelines today: We now no longer allow paintovers of AI generated content. Or in other words AI generated content that has been edited to some degree by humans.
We still have a Discord server, come talk to us!
Want to advertise on e621? Click here!
Are you an artist uploading your own art to e621? Get verified now!
.
close
Posts
[search help]Blacklisted
Artists
Characters
Species
- ? + – canid 1390k
- ? + – canine 1345k
- ? + – canis 739k
- ? + – domestic dog 371k
- ? + – german shepherd 20k
- ? + – herding dog 46k
- ? + – mammal 3588k
- ? + – pastoral dog 47k
General
- ? + – animal genitalia 512k
- ? + – animal penis 356k
- ? + – anthro 3544k
- ? + – armpit hair 47k
- ? + – biped 507k
- ? + – body hair 89k
- ? + – brown body 432k
- ? + – brown fur 348k
- ? + – canine genitalia 183k
- ? + – canine penis 161k
- ? + – ear piercing 275k
- ? + – erection 934k
- ? + – fur 1837k
- ? + – genitals 2392k
- ? + – green eyes 342k
- ? + – hair 1871k
- ? + – hands behind head 33k
- ? + – knot 227k
- ? + – looking at viewer 973k
- ? + – lying 422k
- ? + – male 2661k
- ? + – nipples 1346k
- ? + – nude 1319k
- ? + – on back 251k
- ? + – penis 1647k
- ? + – piercing 435k
- ? + – pose 154k
- ? + – presenting 264k
- ? + – simple background 1318k
- ? + – solo 2466k
Meta
Information
- ID: 359290
- Source:
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 136
- Posted:
- Approver: titanmelon
- Size: 1000x562 (305 KB)
- Type: JPG
- Status: Active
- Favorites: 328 Show
stranger furry
MemberIt could be better without penis.
ThatPurpleFox
MemberThat penis looks too stubby and short :/ I'm with the two comments before me on how this would look better without it. If there was a sheath instead, this would be a lot better.
FoxAssasin
MemberI don't care.The dick looks good on him. :)
KhajiitSneakThief
BlockedRight then. MOAR PENIS!!!!
furry4ever
MemberI think we're getting some foreshortening effect due to the nearly head-on POV...looks fine to me. What's got me wondering is...what's he looking at that gets him that aroused?
PocketSquid
MemberI would straddle him and snuggle the life out of him <3
PocketSquid
Memberyour cock?
TheJollyMonster
MemberIt looks to me (staring at a cock really hard) that his cock is in perspective to this view most of us are not use to viewing, that and a lot of furries seem to have oversized cocks, regular size is fine in my opinion.
Login to respond »